(Based partly on Turnbull guidance)
1. The nature of operations within the organisation arising from its sector, strategic positioning and main activities.
2. The scale and size of operations including factors such as the number of employees. It is generally assumed that larger and more complex organisations have a greater need for internal controls and audit than smaller ones owing to the number of activities occurring that give rise to potential problems.
3. Cost/benefit considerations. Management must weigh the benefits of instituting internal control and audit systems against the costs of doing so. This is likely to be an issue for medium-sized companies or companies experiencing growth.
4. Internal or external changes affecting activities, structures or risks. Changes arising from new products or internal activities can change the need for internal audit and so can external changes such as PESTEL factors.
5. Problems with existing systems, products and/or procedures including any increase in unexplained events. Repeated or persistent problems can signify the need for internal control and audit.
6. The need to comply with external requirements from relevant stock market regulations or laws.
*********
There are a handful of intriguing points with time in this post but I don’t know if I see them all center to heart. There’s some validity but I am going to take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and now we want more! Put into FeedBurner also quality standards in procurement
ReplyDeleteYour new valuable key points imply much a person like me and extremely more to my office workers. With thanks; from every one of us.free zone in dubai
ReplyDelete